2024
Pas de deux XVI
This sixteenth Pas de deux definitely belongs in the series because just like the other fifteen, both chairs share a part somewhere or they touch each other on one spot. Just like in a pas de deux when both partners also alternate very intense and then again extremely subtle contact with each other. Yet this one is also very different from the other fifteen.
For those who are interested: Where is that in?
Mail me your answer via the contact page and you will receive a book in return.
Spel
I have been advocating for real encounters with art for many years. You have to be there to experience it. The disadvantage of art is that you are not allowed to touch it, while that touchability, being able to play with it, enhances the experience. Certainly for children. And I often receive groups when I exhibit, I make an effort for that. Playing with art; a series of drawings, 36 to be precise, with which you can play a game to determine how it will be hung. Try to make units of three where a similarity you find determines the choice. Then explain this to your opponents, especially if it is not clear. You can determine the rules of the game yourself or delve into the game Set, that comes closest. There is not one solution.
Incidentally, apart from the fact that they are (existing) chairs, there is one similarity between all 36 unique chairs.
Pas de deux XV
The pencil drawing Pas de deux XIV asked, even screamed to my mind, for a place in the series of pas de deux watercolours. Added to Pas de deux X, Pas de deux XI and the somewhat older Pas de deux IX and actually also older versions that have since found a home elsewhere. The choice for a ‘back figure’ also imposed itself. Despite this wood bent by Thonet, they straightened their backs and, strengthened by each other, enter a future that we do not yet see. In the meantime we know that this future was rich and still is, this chair is still as popular as ever and is still produced. Who knows what the future will bring?
Solo simili
Levelen V,(Leveling) where the tube frame appears drawn but is cut out, where the shadow effect still gives the shape the metallic color (or is that just projection based on conditioning?) which I made earlier this year, forced me kind of to go even further. That work challenged me to investigate whether it could be done with even less. A sample convinced me and here is the result: Solo simili. Simili refers to the paper used, namely simili japon. This is from the Dutch paper factory Schut.
The most concerned with his own reflection is certainly the Greek mythical figure Narcissus. The famous Italian painter Caravaggio made a masterful painting about it. This graceful chair turns its back on us, but in a detour its downside is clearly visible to us. In painting, the use of mirrors or reflective surfaces has a long tradition. An impressive example is Las Meninas by the Spanish painter Diego Velazquez from 1656. However, depicted in this sober way, in addition to the mirroring, the focus is also entirely on the chair depicted and on the frames. This combination forms an image that we know in many variations from popular culture.
Gerrit Rietveld’s Zigzag or Z chair is displayed somewhat atypically in this viewing cabinet. Adequate protection against too much incident light, you would say. However, the deep shadow contradicts this. And the chair is completely painted or better meaning in pencil. Does that make it a pencil drawing?
Tijdkring IX
The title Time Circle first appeared in my work in 2002. Before that, there were many works in which the circle was a crucial part of the image. Like, for example, Meal of Friends or Stoelendans (Musical chairs). Visualizing the intimate connection with each other is perhaps more beautiful than reality because friction quickly begins to occur there. The moment when every individual fits comfortably into the group never lasts long. Recognizing that moment and enjoying it is often only possible when you look back. The cutting technique that I first discovered in Rietveld and subsequently applied in many works such as Stampede or Babel’s End II is also applicable on this scale.
Carrousel II
This Carrousel II was actually made as a sketch at the same time as Carrousel. Because I didn’t have the frame for this one yet, unlike Carrousel, it was completed a little later. But there is more because in this drawing I have again used the cutting technique and also mounted the circle of chairs in front of the background, giving the light the opportunity to subtly influence the drawing. It creates subtle confusion.
Carrousel
Handrails stretch towards each other until they connect. Six chairs merge into one piece of furniture. I have notoriously bad experiences with spinning, I can’t handle it very well. One of my older memories (first year of kindergarten) is about dancing in a circle. The carousel at the village fair. Yet a rotating circle definitely has its beauty as long as I only have to draw it…
Mirror III
In 2013 I made Spiegel II and I already had the idea to try it with an ellipse, an oval frame. An oval can also be interpreted by the eye, the viewer, as a circle in perspective. The only problem for me was , you just don’t make an oval frame or better two very easy. A least not from solid woord. Recently, while googling, I came across Achter de dijk in Schagen, North Holland. They make round and oval frames in various sizes from good quality wood. I immediately ordered a few tot try them. Apart from painting, I only edited the small frame a bit so that I can drop it into the ‘glass’.